Progress in A Real-world Study of Abiraterone Acetate Versus Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer / 肿瘤防治研究

The safety and survival benefits of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer have been confirmed by randomized controlled trials and clinical studies abroad. However, real-world studies remain lacking. In this article, we review the progress of real-world studies of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and the problems faced in clinical practice against the background of differentiated real-world studies. Further research is needed to address clinically important issues, such as individualized dosing, combination dosing, and monitoring of adverse effects.

A case series on the impact of abiraterone acetate with prednisone in metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma: The real world experience

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the clinical benefit of Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA + P) withandrogen deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer as a local experience in thePhilippines.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#The authors evaluated retrospectively a case series of seven patients receivingandrogen deprivation therapy with high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with AA + P in a tertiary hospitalfrom April 2019 to October 2020. Disease characteristics, biochemical trend, quality of life evaluationusing the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire (EORTCQLQ-C30 v.3), and adverse events reporting using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) Version 5.0 were all retrieved from the medical records as outcome measures.@*RESULTS@#Analysis of 18 months period using chart review was done. Five patients showed clinicalimprovement on positive PSA response. Patients also presented with Grade 1-2 adverse events scorebased on CTCAE including hypertension, hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal symptoms, and electrolyteimbalances. Using the EORTC QLQ-C30 v.3 showed that AA + P provided significant improvementon the overall quality of life, functioning in terms of role, emotional, cognitive and social aspectswith reasonable safety profile and minimal adverse events limited to worsening of gastrointestinalsymptoms from baseline.@*CONCLUSION@#The addition of AA + P to androgen deprivation therapy is a suitable option for bothhigh-risk mCSPC and mCRPC exhibiting a significant biochemical, functional and quality of lifeimprovement with reasonable safety profile and limited adverse events in the ‘real-world’ setting, whichis comparable with the findings in other similar studies.

High IL-23+ cells infiltration correlates with worse clinical outcomes and abiraterone effectiveness in patients with prostate cancer / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Individualized treatment of prostate cancer depends on an accurate stratification of patients who are sensitive to various treatments. Interleukin-23 (IL-23) was reported to play a significant role in prostate cancer. Here, we aimed to explore the clinical value of IL-23-secreting (IL-23+) cells in prostate cancer patients. We evaluated interleukin-23A (IL-23A) expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas database and retrospectively enrolled 179 treatment-naïve metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed in our institute between June 2012 and December 2014. IL-23+ cells were stained and evaluated via immunohistochemistry. Further, survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to explore the prognostic value of IL-23+ cells. We found that IL-23A expression correlated with disease progression, while IL-23+ cells were clearly stained within prostate cancer tissue. Patients with higher Gleason scores and multiple metastatic lesions tended to have more IL-23+ cell infiltration. Further analyses showed that patients with higher levels of IL-23+ cells had significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.996, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.812-4.955; P = 0.001) and a higher risk of developing castration resistance (HR = 2.725, 95% CI: 1.865-3.981; P = 0.001). Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that when patients progressed to a castration-resistant status, the prognostic value of IL-23+ cells was observed only in patients treated with abiraterone instead of docetaxel. Therefore, we showed that high IL-23+ cell infiltration is an independent prognosticator in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. IL-23+ cell infiltration may correlate with abiraterone effectiveness in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Predictors of efficacy of corticosteroid switching from abiraterone plus prednisone to dexamethasone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Corticosteroid switching can reverse abiraterone resistance in some patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we investigated the potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of corticosteroid switching during treatment with abiraterone acetate (AA). We retrospectively analyzed 101 mCRPC patients receiving corticosteroid switching from West China Hospital and Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between January 2016 and December 2018. All cases received AA plus prednisone as first-line therapy during mCRPC. Primary end points were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and overall survival (OS). The risk groups were defined based on multivariate analysis. A total of 42 (41.6%) and 25 (24.8%) patients achieved 30% and 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), respectively, after corticosteroid switching. The median bPFS and median OS on AA plus dexamethasone were 4.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7-6.0) months and 18.8 (95% CI: 16.2-30.2) months, respectively. Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 (AKR1C3) expression (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.15, 95% Cl: 1.22-3.80, P = 0.008) and baseline serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP; HR: 4.95, 95% Cl: 2.40-10.19, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of efficacy before corticosteroid switching in the multivariate analysis of bPFS. Only baseline serum ALP >160 IU l-1 (HR: 3.41, 95% Cl: 1.57-7.38, P = 0.002) together with PSA level at switch ≥50 ng ml-1 (HR: 2.59, 95% Cl: 1.22-5.47, P = 0.013) independently predicted poorer OS. Based on the predictive factors in multivariate analysis, we developed two risk stratification tools to select candidates for corticosteroid switching. Detection of serum ALP level, PSA level, and tissue AKR1C3 expression in mCRPC patients could help make clinical decisions for corticosteroid switching.

Abiraterone acetate base comprehensive for treatment of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a case report and literature review / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Conclusion:Patients with OlimHSPC who are not sensitive to traditional CAB treatment, ADT combined with abiraterone acetate neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative adjuvant therapy can be attempted.

Abiraterone for treatment of germline mutation in BRCA1 gene with low age, high tumor burden and rapid progression of prostate cancer: a case report / 中华泌尿外科杂志

The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing year by year in China. People with BRCA mutation are at high risk of prostate cancer. However, there is no clear and effective treatment for mHSPC with high metastatic load carrying BRCA mutation. In this study, we report a mHSPC patient with high metastatic burden and germline BRCA1 gene mutation who rapidly progressed to mCRPC after traditional CAB therapy and then received ADT combined with abiraterone and achieved significant PSA response, suggesting that ADT combined with abiraterone may be an effective therapy for mHSPC patients with BRCA1 germline mutation.

The clinical exploration of corticosteroid switch of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer / 中华泌尿外科杂志

The terminal stage of prostate cancer is metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with poor prognosis and high mortality. Abiraterone acetate (AA), as a new generation drug for endocrine therapy, has been demonstrated to prolonged overall survival signicantly in mCRPC patients. In addition, a corticosteroid drug must be administered during treatment to avoid side effects of abiraterone. It has been found that a corticosteroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone could delay the development of resistance, significantly prolong the progression-free survival rate of patients, with well tolerance. But the specific mechanism and long-term clinical benefit still need further study. This emerging treatment paradigm provides new ideas for treatment options for patients with mCRPC, however, caution is still needed in clinical practice, and it is recommended to determine the treatment plan after considering all aspects of the patients.

An expert review of novel hormone therapy in metastatic prostate cancer / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Prostate cancer is one of the most common male malignancies all over the world. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) have a poor prognosis compared to those with local disease. In China, most newly diagnosed patients are initially found with distant metastasis. Novel hormone therapies (NHT) develop rapidly in recent years. The randomized clinical trials have demonstrated significant benefits in prolonging overall survival and improving the quality of life. It is essential to choose and optimize regimens following the development of NHT. The article focuses on reviewing current and developing strategies, treatment selection, sequence, and combination in mPCa.

Safety of enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC with hepatic dysfunction / 中华泌尿外科杂志

In March 2019, a patient with advanced prostate cancer was diagnosed in Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, and the disease progressed to the stage of mCRPC after traditional endocrinotherapy. Serious adverse event occurred after 1 month of treatment with abiraterone, which result in drug withdrawal, and replaced therapy by enzalutamide, the effect was good.

Clinical activity of abiraterone plus prednisone in docetaxel-naïve and docetaxel-resistant Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

This study investigated the clinical activity of abiraterone plus prednisone in docetaxel-naïve and docetaxel-resistant Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A total of 146 patients with docetaxel-naïve group (103 cases) and docetaxel-resistant group (43 cases) were enrolled from the Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China) in this retrospective cohort study. The efficacy endpoints were prostate-specific antigen response rate, prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, clinical/radiographic progression-free survival, and overall survival in response to abiraterone plus prednisone. Significantly higher prostate-specific antigen response rate was found in docetaxel-naïve group (54.4%, 56/103) compared to docetaxel-resistant group (34.9%, 15/43) (P = 0.047). In addition, significantly higher median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (14.0 vs 7.7 months, P = 0.005), clinical or radiographic progression-free survival (17.0 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.003), and overall survival (27.0 vs 18.0 months, P = 0.016) were found in docetaxel-naïve group compared to docetaxel-resistant group, respectively. The univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that lower albumin and visceral metastases were independent significant predictors for shorter overall survival. To sum up, our data suggested that abiraterone plus prednisone was efficient in both docetaxel-naïve and docetaxel-resistant Chinese patients. Moreover, higher PSA response rate and longer overall survival were observed in the docetaxel-naïve group, which suggested that abiraterone was more effective for docetaxel- naïve patients than for docetaxel failures.

Análise de custo-efetividade da abiraterona para câncer de próstata metastático resistente à castração em pacientes com uso prévio de quimioterapia / Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone for metastatic, castrateresistant prostate cancer following previous chemotherapy

Objetivo: Avaliar a custo-utilidade e o impacto orçamentário (IO) da abiraterona para o tratamento de câncer de próstata resistente à castração, em pacientes previamente tratados com docetaxel. Métodos: Foi construído um modelo de Markov com ciclos mensais sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), em um horizonte temporal de cinco anos e taxa de desconto de 5%. A estimativa de efetividade foi oriunda do principal ensaio clínico dessa condição de saúde. Para dados de utilidade, aplicaram-se estimativas internacionais, enquanto para custos se utilizaram tabelas de remuneração do SUS. Para o IO, a população-alvo foi estimada com base em dados do Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Resultados: A abiraterona ocasionou ganho de 1,045 ano de vida ajustado para qualidade (QALY) e 1,609 ano de vida ganho (AVG), enquanto para o placebo esses valores foram de 0,763 e 1,299, respectivamente. O custo total na estratégia abiraterona foi de R$ 83.295 e para o placebo, de R$ 2.895. A relação de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) foi de R$ 284.416 por QALY ganho. Em nenhuma das análises de sensibilidade os valores ficaram abaixo de R$ 100.000 por QALY. Mesmo quando variados simultaneamente seis parâmetros, todos no seu limite mais favorável à abiraterona, os resultados seguiram elevados, com RCEI de R$ 98.330 por QALY. O IO foi de R$ 270 milhões em cinco anos no cenário mais conservador (tempo médio de tratamento de 7,4 meses e 10% de novos casos/ano). Conclusão: A abiraterona se mostrou pouco custo-efetiva nesta situação clínica, com RCEI superior a nove vezes o PIB per capita por QALY, sendo os resultados robustos em análise de sensibilidade.

Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility and the budget impact (BI) of abiraterone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel. Methods: A Markov model was constructed, with monthly cycles, under the perspective of the Brazilian Public Healthcare System (SUS), in a 5-year time horizon, and with a 5% discount rate. The effectiveness estimate was obtained from the pivotal clinical trial for abiraterone in this health condition. For utility data, international estimates were applied; while for costs, SUS reimbursement information were used. In the BI analysis, the target population was estimated with claims data from DATASUS. Results: Abiraterone resulted in a gain of 1.045 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and 1.609 life years gained (LYG), while for placebo these values were 0.763 and 1.299, respectively. The total cost for the abiraterone strategy was BRL 83,295, and for placebo, BRL 2,895. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was BRL 284,416 per QALY gained. None of the estimates from the sensitivity analysis was below BRL 100,000 per QALY. Even when six parameters were variated simultaneously in the range more favorable to abiraterone, the results were still elevated, with an ICER of BRL 98,330 per QALY. The BI was BRL 270 million in 5 years in the most conservative scenario (average time of the treatment of 7.4 months and 10% of the new cases/year). Conclusion: Abiraterone shows unfavorable cost-effective results for this clinical condition in Brazil, with an ICER above 9 times the per capita per QALY. Results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

Serum levels of neuroendocrine differentiation markers predict the prognosis of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective To determine the influence of abiraterone acetate (AA) on neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and the prognostic predicting value of the serum NED markers in mCRPC patients treated with AA.Methods We conducted an analysis in 115 chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients who were treated with chemotherapy in Renji hospital from 2013 to 2017.The median age was 70,ranged from 65 to 76 years old.The median CgA,NSE and PSA levels were 101.1 ng/ml (78.5-150.0 ng/ml),13.4 ng/ml (10.5-17.6 ng/ml) and 38.8 ng/ml (11.2-123.2 ng/ml),respectively.Among them,48 cases were classified as the group without AA treatment.The other 67 cases were classified as group after AA failure.In group without AA treatment,the median CgA,NSE and PSA levels were 109.1 ng/ml(80-151.5 ng/ml);13.8 ng/ml(10.8-18.2 ng/ml) and 39.2 ng/ml (8.6-200 ng/ml),respectively.In group after AA failure,the median CgA,NSE and PSA levels were 105.4 ng/ml(78.8-175.5 ng/ml),13.8 ng/ml(10.8-17.6 ng/ml) and 39.0 ng/ml(8.4-219.8 ng/ml),respectively.In the group with serial evaluation of NED markers during AA treatment,the median serum CgA,NSE levels at baseline were 115.9 ng/ml(90.1-201.5 ng/ml),13.3 ng/ml (10.4-18.1 ng/ml),respectively.The endpoints were PSA PFS(progression-free survival) and radiographic PFS (rPFS).Results In 34 patients with serial evaluation,serum NED markers level in 19 patients increased after the failure of AA treatment.Median serum CgA and NSE levels were 115.9 ng/ml(90.1-201.5 ng/ml)and 13.25 ng/ml (10.37-18.14 ng/ml) at baseline.Median serum CgA and NSE levels were 129.6ng/ml (75.5-230.5 ng/ml) and 14.7 ng/ml (11.8-19.1 ng/ml) after 6 months treatment,respectively.The median serum CgA and NSE levels were 130.4 ng/ml (95.7-205.7 ng/ml) and 15.2 ng/ml(12.4-18.7 ng/ml) at the time of failure of AA treatment,respectively.There was no significant difference of NED markers between baseline and failure of AA treatment (P =0.243).In logistic univariate analysis,AA treatment and its duration were not independent factors influencing NED(P =0.30;P =0.52).Compared with the NED markers elevation group in the first 6 months of AA treatment and baseline supranormal NED markers group,the NED markers decline group(PSA PFS(17.1 vs.10.4 months,P ＜ 0.001) and rPFS (17.0 vs.10.4 months,P =0.003)) and baseline normal NED markers group(PSA PFS(14.1 vs.9.5 months,P =0.001) and rPFS(16.4 vs.10.5 months,P ＜ 0.001)) has a longer median PSA PFS and rPFS respectively.In multivariate Cox analysis,baseline NED markers level and NED markers variation during the first 6 months of AA treatment remained significant predictors of rPFS(P ＜ 0.05),and PSA-PFS (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions We found there was heterogeneity in changes of NED markers in different mCRPC patients during AA treatment,and AA might not significantly lead to progression of NED of mCRPC in general.Serial CgA and NSE evaluation might help clinicians guide clinical treatment of mCRPC patients.Serum NED markers elevation during the first 6 months of AA treatment and elevated baseline NED markers levels indicated poor prognosis in mCRPC treated with AA.

External validation and newly development of a nomogram to predict overall survival of abiraterone-treated, castration-resistant patients with metastatic prostate cancer / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Abiraterone acetate is approved for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC); however, its effects vary. An accurate prediction model to identify patient groups that will benefit from abiraterone treatment is therefore urgently required. The Chi model exhibits a good profile for risk classification, although its utility for the chemotherapy-naive group is unclear. This study aimed to externally validate the Chi model and develop a new nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 110 patients. Patients were distributed among good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, according to the Chi model. The good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups had a sample size of 59 (53.6%), 34 (30.9%), and 17 (15.5%) in our dataset, and a median OS of 48.4, 29.1, and 10.5 months, respectively. The C-index of external validation of Chi model was 0.726. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified low hemoglobin concentrations (<110 g-l-1), liver metastasis, and a short time interval from androgen deprivation therapy to abiraterone initiation (<36 months) as predictors of OS. Accordingly, a new nomogram was developed with a C-index equal to 0.757 (95% CI, 0.678-0.836). In conclusion, the Chi model predicted the prognosis of abiraterone-treated, chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC, and we developed a new nomogram to predict the overall survival of this group of patients with less parameters.

Supervivencia del cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración en la práctica clínica y el papel del tratamiento / Survival of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Clinical Practice and the Role of Treatment

Resumen Objetivo: Evaluar en un contexto de práctica clínica la ventaja de supervivencia para pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a castración (CPRC) tratado activamente con diversos tratamientos que incluyen acetato de abiraterona (AA) y prednisona con o sin docetaxel. Material y método: Se analiza la supervivencia de pacientes con CPRC y se compara un grupo tratado con AA y prednisona (n = 33) con un control histórico formado por pacientes consecutivos tratados una década antes en la misma institución exclusivamente con retirada de antiandrógeno y medidas paliativas (n = 31). Se analizan variables clínico-patológicas predictivas de pronóstico en la población activamente tratada. Se evalúa la respuesta global a AA y el intervalo libre de progresión radiológica. Resultados: La supervivencia cáncer específica a 2 años fue 79% para pacientes tratados activamente y 17,2% para control (log-rank, p < 0,0001). Cinco de 13 pacientes con AA post-docetaxel (38,5%) recibieron después de AA quimioterapia de segunda línea (4 cabazitaxel y 1 vinorelbina) y 1 (7,7%) hormonoterapia con enzalutamida. Tres de 20 pacientes tratados con AA sin quimioterapia (15%) recibieron enzalutamida y solo 1 (5%) fue tratado con docetaxel. Los pacientes de menor edad (<65años; p = 0,02) y sin metástasis al diagnóstico (p = 0,04) tuvieron mejor pronóstico. Aquellos de PSA más alto (>45ng/ml; p = 0,09) y patrón de Gleason 5 en la biopsia se comportaron de manera más desfavorable. Globalmente el 75,8% tuvieron respuesta a AA (80% pre- y 69,2% post-quimioterapia; p = 0,1) y el 52,4% estuvieron libre de progresión radiológica al año (47,9% pre y 49,8% post-quimioterapia; log-rank, p = 0,3). Conclusión: El tratamiento de pacientes con CPRC prolonga la expectativa de supervivencia en un entorno de práctica clínica y es posible identificar factores predictivos de pronóstico en estos pacientes.

Abstract Purpose: To assess, in a clinical practice context, the survival advantages of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) actively treated with several treatments that include abiraterone acetate (AA) and prednisone, with or without docetaxel. Material and Methods: An analysis was performed on patient survival with CRPC, and was compared to a group treated with AA and prednisone (n = 33), with a historical control treated exclusively with anti-androgen withdrawal and palliative measures (n = 31). In the population actively treated, variables predictive of prognosis were analysed, as well as an evaluation of the overall response to AA and radiographic progression-free survival. Results: Cancer-specific survival at 2 years was 79% for patients actively treated and 17.2% for control group (P<.0001). Five (38.5%) of 13 patients treated with AA post-docetaxel received second-line chemotherapy after AA (4 cabazitaxel, 1 vinorelbine), and one (7.7%) enzalutamide. Three (15%) of 20 patients treated with AA without chemotherapy received enzalutamide and 1(5%) docetaxel. The younger patients (<65yrs; P=.02) without metastases at diagnosis (P=.04) had better prognoses. Patients with higher PSA levels (>45 ng/ml; P=.09) and a Gleason pattern 5 in the biopsy had less favourable outcomes. There was a 75.8% over response to AA (80% preand 69.2%post-chemotherapy; P=.1), and 69.2%post-chemotherapy; P=.1), and 52.4% were radiographic progression-free at 1 year of treatment (47.9% pre- and 49.8% post-chemotherapy; P=.3). Conclusion: Treatment of CRPC patients extends survival expectations in a clinical practice setting and prognostic predictors can be identified in these patients.

Análise de custo-efetividade do acetato de abiraterona associado à prednisona pós-terapia de privação androgênica, seguido de enzalutamida pós-quimioterapia versus a sequência oposta para o tratamento de pacientes com câncer de próstata metastático resistentes à castração sob a perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro / Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in the post-androgen deprivation therapy setting followed by enzalutamide in the post-chemotherapy setting versus the opposite treatment sequence in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients under the Brazilian Private Healthcare System perspective

Objetivo: O acetato de abiraterona e a enzalutamida são utilizados no tratamento de câncer de próstata metastático pós-terapia de privação androgênica, em pacientes resistentes à castração. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o custo-efetividade de abiraterona mais prednisona pós-terapia de privação androgênica, seguidos de docetaxel e enzalutamida pós-quimioterapia com a sequência oposta de tratamento no Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro. Métodos: Um modelo de Markov foi desenvolvido para comparar o custo-efetividade das duas sequências em um tempo horizonte lifetime. Os parâmetros de eficácia e probabilidades de transição foram derivados de estudos clínicos. Foram considerados os custos diretos dos medicamentos, administração, monitoramento e eventos adversos. A medida de efetividade foram anos de vida ganhos, estimados pela extrapolação de dados dos estudos clínicos. Os resultados foram apresentados em custos e anos de vida ganho a cada sequência. Resultados: O estado pós-terapia de privação androgênica representou a maior parte dos custos de tratamento, e os eventos adversos tiveram pequeno impacto nos custos totais. O uso de abiraterona nesse estado reduziu 7,3% dos custos. A sequência abiraterona mais prednisona pós-terapia de privação androgênica, seguida de enzalutamida pós-quimioterapia, foi dominante em relação à oposta; apresentou menor custo (R$ 262.801 versus R$ 274.165) e efetividade levemente maior, com estimados 3,367 anos de vida ganhos versus 3,282. Conclusão: O uso da abiraterona mais prednisona pós-terapia de privação androgênica e enzalutamida pós-quimioterapia demonstrou-se dominante em relação à sequência oposta no tratamento de pacientes com câncer de próstata metastático resistentes à castração, no Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro.

Objective: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are important options in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. The objective of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of the use of abiraterone plus prednisone post-ADT, followed by docetaxel and enzalutamide post-chemotherapy (Abi+Doce+Enza) with the opposite treatment sequence (Enza+Doce+Abi) under the perspective of the Brazilian private healthcare system. Methods: A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of both sequences in a lifetime time horizon. Transition probabilities and efficacy data were drawn from clinical studies. Cost parameters included drug acquisition and administration, disease monitoring and adverse events were considered. Effectiveness was measured as life years gained, derived from clinical trials. Results were presented as total costs and life years gained in each sequence. Results: Post-ADT state represented the majority of the treatment costs, and adverse events had little impact in total costs. The sequence Enza+Doce+Abi was dominated by Abi+Doce+Enza. The sequence Abi+Doce+Enza generated a reduction of 7,3% in total treatment costs compared to Enza+Doce+Abi (R$ 262,801 vs R$ 274,165). Effectiveness was slightly higher, with an estimated 3.367 life-years gained in the Abi+Doce+Enza sequence compared with 3.282 life-years gained in the Enza+Doce+Abi sequence. Conclusion: The use of abiraterone plus prednisone post-ADT and enzalutamide in post-chemo had lower treatment costs and higher effectiveness when compared to the opposite sequence in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, under the Brazilian Private Health System perspective.

Efficacy and prognostic factors of abiraterone combined with prednisone treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients / 上海交通大学学报（医学版）

Objective· To assess the efficacy of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients and analyze the prognostic factors for this treatment. Methods · The medical history of 112 patients with mCRPC treated in Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, including 70 patients in the chemotherapy-na?ve setting and 42 in the post-chemotherapy setting, were retrospectively reviewed. Coprimary end points were prostate specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors that were associated with PSA PFS, rPFS and OS. Results · At a median follow-up of 20.2 months, 59 (52.7%) patients had died. The median PSA PFS, rPFS and OS were 8.9 (7.8~10.0) months, 9.7 (9.0~10.4) months, and 22.2 (20.3~24.1) months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, previous chemotherapy, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio(≥3 vs<3),serum lactate dehydrogenase level(≥196 U/L vs<196 U/L)and ECOG PS(≤?1 vs 2)were independent predictors for PSA PFS and rPFS,and previous chemotherapy,ECOG PS(≤?1 vs 2)remained significant predictors for OS. Conclusion·These results further support the favourable profile of AA plus prednisone in patients with mCRPC in China.Previous chemotherapy,ECOG PS(≤?1 vs 2)remained significant predictors for OS.

Indirect comparison between abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and sequential administration of abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (Enz) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A literature search was performed with PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Reviewed literature included published phase III trials of AA or Enz in mCRPC and studies regarding their sequential administration. Given the difference in control arms in AA (active comparator) and Enz (true placebo) randomized phase III studies, indirect comparisons between AA and Enz in mCRPC showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival in prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy settings (HR: 0.90, 95% CI, 0.73-1.11; HR: 0.85, 95% CI, 0.68-1.07). Compared with AA, Enz may better outperform control arms in treating mCRPC both before and after chemotherapy regarding secondary endpoints based on indirect comparisons: time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (HR: 0.34, 95% CI, 0.28-0.42; HR: 0.40, 95% CI, 0.30-0.53), radiographic progression-free survival (HR: 0.37, 95% CI, 0.28-0.48; HR: 0.61, 95% CI, 0.50-0.74), and PSA response rate (OR: 18.29, 95% CI, 11.20-29.88; OR: 10.69, 95% CI, 3.92-29.20). With regard to the effectiveness of Enz following AA or AA following Enz, recent retrospective case series reported overall survival and secondary endpoints for patients with mCRPC progression after chemotherapy. However, confirmatory head-to-head trials are necessary to determine the optimal sequencing of these agents.